Degree Regulations

The degree regulations for students can be found on the University website.

If you commenced your studies before September 2012 you should consult the degree regulations for students registered on an undergraduate programme on or after 1 September 2010 (but prior to 1 September 2012) which can be found on the University website here.

Bachelors Degree
classification weighted to 120 credits
Classification thresholds:
weighted average (0 to 100 mark range)
Boundary zone weighted average
First class 70.0 68.0 to 69.9
Upper Second class 60.0 58.0 to 59.9
Lower Second class 50.0 48.0 to 49.9
Third class 40.0 37.0 to 39.9

Note, unlike the BSc degrees, it is not possible to attain a 3rd class for an MSci degree.  Consequently, MSci students who obtain a final mark of less than 50% will fail the MSci degree.  However, you will be able to graduate with BSc(Hons) degree based on your performance during your first three years.

MSci degrees

The award of a MSci Degree in the School of Biological Sciences involves assessment of first year units (6%) second year units (19% of total), third year units (37.5%) and fourth-year project (37.5%).  For examination purposes, your third year work is divided into 12 units, each contributing 3.125% (total 37.5%) to the final degree marks. The total allocation of marks is as follows:

First year 6%
Second year: 19%
Third year:
Special Programme Problem/Essay papers 6.25% (2 units = 20 credits)
Lecture units 12.5/15.625/18.75% (4/5/6 units = 40/50/60 credits)*
BIOL33000*, BIOL33011*, BIOL33012 & BIOL33021 & BIOL33031

* Compulsory

12.5/15.625/18.75% (4/5/6 units = 40/50/60 credits)*

*Depending on degree course and unit selection

Fourth Year  37.5%

 


Pass marks and degree classification

Degree classification is based on the marks from the six components weighted as outlined in section Assessments and examinations (MSciL4) and is determined at a meeting of the Board of Examiners for a particular Degree Programme, with the External Examiner present to act as advisor and arbiter. The following numerical boundaries will be used as guidelines by the Board of Examiners in deciding your degree category:

  • First class 70% and above
  • Upper Second class 60% and above
  • Lower Second class 50% and above

The pass mark is 40% in Year 1-3 and 50% in Year 4.

Please note, that there are additional criteria to be met in order to obtain a degree class commensurate with the final weighted average mark. In addition to obtaining a final mark within boundaries set out above, in order to obtain a lower second degree or above, 80 final year credits must have marks of at least 50%.

N.B. The Board of Examiners will take into account the following points when deciding degree classification:

  • Where there are factors that may have adversely affected a student's performance OR where a student is within 2% below a boundary, cases will be considered individually to determine whether the higher degree classification should be awarded.
  • The External Examiner plays an important role. He/she moderates examination question papers and reads student examination scripts and placement/project reports.
  • Degree classifications for candidates whose average overall mark falls within 2% below the borders between degree classifications will be decided as follows. If you have marks in the next higher degree class over or 75 credits then you will automatically be awarded the next  higher classification. If you do not fall into this category, then classification review by viva voce will occur, as set out in “Regulations for Undergraduate Awards”Appendix A. Classification review will not be applied in cases where there is a penalty of one lower degree class due to failure of more than 40 credits.
  • In reaching their decision on academic results, Examination Boards may take account of certain circumstances brought to their attention (for the University’s policy on mitigating circumstances please see Section Mitigating Circumstances).

Absence from any final-level examination will normally result in a zero mark being returned for that examination.  There are no referrals.  A candidate who is ill must follow the procedures indicated under 'Guidelines on Ill Heath' Section. However, students should make every effort to take the paper.


Publication of examination results and degree classifications

Following the Board of Examiners meetings all degree classifications will be published by the date advertised in the front cover of this handbook and will be communicated through the My Manchester Student Portal; details on how to access them can be found at http://www.studentnet.manchester.ac.uk/crucial-guide/academic-life/exams/results/.

Results for individual examinations will be published on the date advertised in the front cover of this handbook (for semester 1 examinations). Practical assessment and other coursework marks may be published on an ongoing basis.

Precise publication dates and times for certain groups of degree programmes may occur before this and full details will be published nearer to the examination boards.


Academic Transcripts

The University has implemented a secure online document service called e-Docs. This system allows graduates to access their documents online and allows employers to verify the authenticity of these electronic documents via a secure website hosted at The University of Manchester. This allows you to manage the release of your documents to a third party, e.g. a prospective employer, electronically, effectively allowing them to verify the information via the University's secure website. This removes the need to entrust your original documents to the post and speeds up the communication process considerably. See the Crucial Guide Live at https://my.manchester.ac.uk/d/crucial-guide/academic-life/award-confirmation/transcripts/ for further information.


Turnitin

The University uses electronic systems for the purposes of detecting plagiarism and other forms of academic malpractice and for marking.  Such systems include TurnitinUK, the plagiarism detection service used by the University.

As part of the formative and/or summative assessment process, you may be asked to submit electronic versions of your work to TurnitinUK and/or other electronic systems used by the University (this requirement may be in addition to a requirement to submit a paper copy of your work).  If you are asked to do this, you must do so within the required timescales.

The School also reserves the right to submit work handed in by you for formative or summative assessment to TurnitinUK and/or other electronic systems used by the University.

Please note that when work is submitted to the relevant electronic systems, it may be copied and then stored in a database to allow appropriate checks to be made.


External Examiners

25 2

External Examiners are individuals from another institution or organisation who monitor the assessment processes of the University to ensure fairness and academic standards. They ensure that assessment and examination procedures have been fairly and properly implemented and that decisions have been made after appropriate deliberation. They also ensure that standards of awards and levels of student performance are at least comparable with those in equivalent higher education institutions.

External Examiners’ reports relating to programmes within the School of Biological Sciences will be shared with student representatives at the Student/Staff Liaison Committee (SSLC), where details of any actions carried out by the School in response to the External Examiners’ comments will be discussed. You should contact your student representatives if you require any further information about External Examiners’ reports or the process for considering them. External Examiners’ reports and the School’s responses to them can be found here.

The External Examiners for each programme are as follows:

Programme External Examiner Institution
Anatomical Sciences Dr Clare Lamb University of Dundee
Biochemistry Dr Stuart Knight King's College London
Biology TBC TBD
Biology with Science & Society TBC TBC
Biomedical Sciences Dr Gordon McEwan University of Aberdeen
Biomedical Sciences Dr Steve Christmas University of Liverpool
Biotechnology Dr Karen Robinson University of Nottingham
Cell Biology Dr Kristin Braun Barts and London School of Medicine & Dentistry
Cognitive Neuroscience & Psychology Dr Allison Fulford University of Bristol
Developmental Biology Dr Sinead Drea University of Leicester
Genetics Dr Henry Roehl University of Sheffield
Immunology Dr Martin Stacey University of Leeds
Medical Biochemistry Dr Stuart Knight King's College London
Microbiology Dr Karen Robinson University of Nottingham
Molecular Biology Dr Kristin Braun Barts and London School of Medicine & Dentistry
Neuroscience Dr Allison Fulford University of Bristol
Pharmacology Dr Lesley MacVinish University of Cambridge
Pharmacology & Physiology Dr Lesley MacVinish University of Cambridge
Physiology Dr Lesley MacVinish University of Cambridge
Plant Sciences Dr Sinead Drea University of Leicester
Zoology Dr Steve Portugal Royal Holloway University of London
Please note that it is inappropriate for students to make direct contact with External Examiners under any circumstances, and in particular with regards to a student’s individual performance in assessments. Other appropriate mechanisms are available for students, including the University’s appeals or complaints procedures and the UMSU Advice Centre. In cases where a student does contact an External Examiner directly, External Examiners have been requested not to respond to direct queries. Instead, External Examiners will report the matter to their School contact who will then contact the student to remind them of the other methods available for students. If students have any queries concerning this, they should contact the Student Support Office in the first instance.

Return to Contents