Essay Mark Scheme
The following mark scheme is used for essays and short coursework items unless otherwise stated. Mark scheme arrangements for dissertations may differ, and will be listed in the dissertation course unit outline.
90 – 100% Distinction-level performance of the highest possible quality. Exemplary work, highly accurate, innovatively analytical and critical, demonstrating rigorous and insightful judgement, thoroughly original approaches, an innovative and illuminating use of sources, and exemplary execution. Of comparable quality to publishable work. Presentation at or above typical professional standard.
80 – 89% Distinction-level performance of unusually high quality. Excellent work, very accurate, demonstrating highly analytical style and approach with insightful judgement and highly skilled execution, original critical approach and a thoroughly illuminating use of sources. Approaching the standards of publishable work. Excellent presentation.
70 – 79% Distinction-level. Excellent work, accurate, showing clear evidence of comprehensiveness, soundness of judgement, focus, analytical powers, insight, critical depth, skilful execution, and illuminating use of sources. Very good presentation.
60 – 69% Merit-level. Mainly accurate, based on good reading, shows evidence of understanding of the research topic, good structure and relevant conclusions, sound in its judgements and arguments, comprehensive in coverage, effective in its use of sources, well-presented, and exhibiting, especially at the top end, a degree of depth and imagination.
50 – 59% Pass-level. Shows sufficient grasp of the issues and reading of a sufficient range of relevant material. In argument and presentation, demonstrates accuracy, coherence, consistency, some critical and analytical ability, and (where relevant) adequate use of sources, but lacks depth and imagination. Presentation is acceptable for university purposes but not for a wider audience.
40 – 49% Below pass-level. Shows a basic grasp of the issues posed, evidence of reading in relation to them, and coverage of their major aspects. The work may be descriptive in character and will lack the level of analysis and argument required at Master’s level. The presentation of the work will be consistent with conventions. Presentation sufficiently clear for comprehension, but has no other merit.
30 – 39% Significantly below pass-level. Shows an elementary grasp of the issues posed, some evidence of reading in relation to them and some coverage, albeit incomplete, of their major aspects. The work is primarily descriptive but incompletely so or crudely analytical in character, and does not construct a cogent argument. Presentation is barely consistent with conventions.
20 – 29% Very poor work. Does not show even an elementary grasp of the issues, and reading is limited or irrelevant. The work is neither a cogent narrative or descriptive piece nor a structured argument. Presentation may not be consistent with conventions and has no other merit.
0 – 19% Should be reserved for work displaying ignorance of the most basic conventions. Marks below 10 are reserved for totally vacuous submissions (no submission or thoroughly incoherent prose).